On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 1:41 PM, Phil Hagelberg <[email protected]> wrote:

> David Nolen <[email protected]> writes:
>
> > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 12:59 PM, Daniel Gagnon <[email protected]
> >> wrote:
> >
> >     Could this tutorial explain the foremost question people have
> >     when seeing core.logic: why is o appened to the names of all
> >     those functions?
> >
> >
> > It's a convention from The Reasoned Schemer. It's just an easy way to
> > differentiate goals from regular functions.
>
> Wouldn't it be more idiomatic Clojure to use namespaces?
>
> -Phil


core.logic embraces freely mixing functional and logic programming.

David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to