Righto, I'll add this to the discussion. On Thursday, 15 March 2012 21:53:51 UTC, David Nolen wrote: > > On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 5:41 PM, Sean Corfield <[email protected]>wrote: > >> On Thu, Mar 15, 2012 at 2:16 PM, Baishampayan Ghose <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> > There is run, but `run` takes an extra argument `n` and will solve for >> > only `n` results while `run*` solves for all. >> >> Ah, OK. That makes sense. Perhaps that could be added to the primer? >> (just curious: why not run-all?) >> > > core.logic's core API matches as closely as possible the one provided by > the original Scheme miniKanren. While this may give core.logic a Scheme-y > flavor, I'm not willing to give up on the benefits, for example: > > https://github.com/webyrd/TAPL-in-miniKanren-cKanren-core.logic > > I agree we should probably mention run N. > > David >
-- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
