On Mon, May 14, 2012 at 7:27 PM, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com>wrote:
> (def tree (function-that-produces-an-enormous-tree 2)) > Isn't doing this at the top level bad form? > So there are a couple examples of things that are harder to do when your > REPL prints the values that are attached to variables. But again, the real > question here is, why does Clojurescript deviate on this point? I know > that Clojurescript doesn't exactly match Clojure, but shouldn't all > deviations be done for a reason? > > --Mark There are a few good reasons to not reify things like vars and namespaces in ClojureScript - one of these is Google Closure Compiler. Also I don't see how this isn't solved by modifying some habits. (defn test-tree [] (function-that-produces-an-enormous-tree 2)) (time (test-tree)) David -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
