On Tuesday, May 15, 2012 3:41:58 PM UTC-4, Dan Cross wrote: > > My own personal opinion is that it makes sense in combination with 'and', > but others may feel differently. E.g., > > (when-let [a (allocate-thing) b (read-into-thing a) c > (extract-something-from-thing b)] > (do-something-with c)) > > makes intuitive sense to me. If, at any stage of the execution, any of a, > b or c was nil, the evaluation would stop and the (when-let) form would > return nil. > > So judging by both your response and my response, it should behave like the maybe monad.
-Walter -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
