Also, does (into-array Double/TYPE data)
work? If it does, it's not the ideal solution, but at least we could rule out some possible causes... Cheers, M. On 16 May 2012 20:11, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: > Also, is the output of normalize transformed in any way before being > passed on to the method which blow up? > > M. > > > On 16 May 2012 20:09, Michał Marczyk <michal.marc...@gmail.com> wrote: >> Could you replace (doubles data) in that troublesome spot with >> >> (doto (doubles data) ((comp prn class))) >> >> and note what gets printed? >> >> M. >> >> >> On 16 May 2012 19:59, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Yes that gave me a stack trace but it does not give me more info than i >>> already know...For examlple i know the exception occurs at the call to >>> analyze...the question is why? 'analyze' and 'process' both expect a >>> double-array and a double-array is what 'normalize' delivers... >>> >>> >>> ClassCastException [D cannot be cast to java.lang.Number >>> clojure.lang.Numbers.double_array (Numbers.java:1068) >>> clojure-encog.training/make-data/fn--963 (training.clj:37) >>> clojure-encog.examples/eval1041 (NO_SOURCE_FILE:1) >>> clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6511) >>> clojure.lang.Compiler.eval (Compiler.java:6477) >>> clojure.core/eval (core.clj:2797) >>> clojure.main/repl/read-eval-print--6405 (main.clj:245) >>> clojure.main/repl/fn--6410 (main.clj:266) >>> clojure.main/repl (main.clj:266) >>> clojure.tools.nrepl.middleware.interruptible-eval/evaluate/fn--337 >>> (interruptible_eval.clj:51) >>> clojure.core/apply (core.clj:601) >>> clojure.core/with-bindings* (core.clj:1771) >>> >>> >>> Jim >>> >>> >>> On 16/05/12 18:15, Aaron Cohen wrote: >>> >>> On Wed, May 16, 2012 at 1:04 PM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com> >>> wrote: >>>> >>>> This is the only error I'm getting - there is no stack trace or at least i >>>> can not see it...I'm inside leiningen 2 preview 4... I can however provide >>>> 2 >>>> screenshots confirming what is happening. >>> >>> >>> Your most recent exception should be stored in "*e". >>> >>> To hopefully print a nice stack trace: >>> >>> (use 'clojure.repl) >>> (pst) >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >>> first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en >>> >>> >>> -- >>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >>> Groups "Clojure" group. >>> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com >>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your >>> first post. >>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >>> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com >>> For more options, visit this group at >>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
