Yep, i changed it in futures...
I am unsure about the atom of api-key, in theory i won't need to change my
api-key, but idk... You can get a lot of api-key gratis which are a little
limited or just one payed api-key that can do everything...
Il giorno giovedì 24 maggio 2012 00:56:25 UTC-5, Ulises ha scritto:
>
> > Looking the code again I believe that I should use a future and not an
> > agent...
> > I am right ???
>
> I would think so. AFAIK, the advice has always been "if you need to do
> some computation on another thread don't (ab)use agents, use futures".
>
> Additionally, you have[1]:
>
> (def #^{:dynamic true} *api-key* (atom "N6E4NIOVYMTHNDM8J"))
>
> unless you're planning on setting the key to different values in
> different threads (unlikely?) you don't need to use an atom there.
>
> All I've said above could be completely wrong so be warned :)
>
> U
>
> [1]
> https://github.com/siscia/echonest-clojure-api/blob/master/src/echonest_api/with-doc-core.clj#L16
>
>
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
