On Jun 8, 2012, at 2:21 AM, Cédric Pineau wrote: > > 2012/6/8 Cédric Pineau <cedric.pin...@gmail.com> > > 2012/6/8 Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant <abonnaireserge...@gmail.com> > No. I assume you mean seqable. > > If it did exist, it would look something like: > > Is there a simple test for sequable? > > Oh ok, I don't get the difference between seq and seqable.. > > > I think I got it : > (seqable? a) check if a can be transform into a seq > (seq? a) check if a _is_ a seq > > Sorry for the noise :-) > Not noise - you helped me get the distinction (and thus the thread) and so on behalf of all of us, quiet and clueless: I salute you :-)
bill -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
