On Fri, Jun 8, 2012 at 5:55 PM, OGINO Masanori <masanori.og...@gmail.com> wrote: > There are many negative votes for the proposal and the main doubt is > "do you need to make them in closure.string?"
Hi Ogino, Please don't misinterpret my comments as saying you're wasting time. By all means, keep working on this. `tabify` and functions like it could be useful to others, I just don't know yet. If you can demonstrate an improvement to clojure.repl by adding these functions, then I think that's enough justification to add them -- maybe first as private fns in clojure.repl. Later on, if they seem generally useful, we can incorporate them into clojure.string. Thanks, -Stuart -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
