On Thu, Jun 14, 2012 at 8:09 AM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote: > (doto foo > (.bar x) > (.baz y) > (dotimes [i 10] (.zab g))) > > won't work because foo is substituted as the second argument of 'dotimes'! > It has to be 'do' instead of 'doto'... > > very subtle trap... > > Jim
I think the "trap" here (if there is one) is that coming from another language, you might believe that "doto" is setting some magical "context" value. For instance, the with statement in javascript does some sort of magic to alter the "current scope". If you understand that "doto" is simply a macro that alters the source code that it is invoked upon, it's pretty clear what is wrong with your code. This same understanding then applies to all the other similar macros (.., ->, ->>). None of them are doing anything other than rearranging source code. --Aaron -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
