Is there any reason why "last" needs to be slow on vectors? Can it just do the right thing and be fast on it?
On Thursday, June 28, 2012 4:28:30 PM UTC-4, Meikel Brandmeyer (kotarak) wrote: > > Hi, > > Am 28.06.2012 um 20:52 schrieb Tassilo Horn: > > > And yes, there are some counter examples like `count` and `last`... > > last is not a counterexample. last is a sequence function, which acts on > seqs. It just calls seq on its argument so you may pass in a vector (or > anything seqable). The vector equivalent of last is peek, btw. > > nth is better example, since it's fast on vectors and O(n) on seqs and > lists. Just like count. > > Kind regards > Meikel > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
