> You can get hold of a protocol's implementation for a particular type > if it was attached to a type with extend / extend-type / > extend-protocol: > Yes, but it's unofficial, undocumented and, as you've stated already, can't be used with inlined implementations.
> Implementations specified inline in a deftype/defrecord form cannot be > so obtained, because they only exist as JVM methods. Basically by > inlining an implementation you gain speed at the cost of some dynamic > / reflective capabilities. > I don't see the reason why deftype\defrecord can't also save the inlined bodies in functions. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
