On Friday, July 6, 2012 10:55:24 AM UTC+2, Jacobo Polavieja wrote: > > It may be due to my background, but that I understand or feel a lot better > :). I suppose as time passes and I see more and more Clojure code that will > change anyway. > > I know this is going very offtopic, but why did you use "let" define > "in-matrix?" instead of a defn? That's another thing I'm finding a little > bit confusing... in F# you just use "let" for everything", in Haskelll you > don't type anything. So, why would it be more appropiate? > > Thanks a lot! >
Ok, I know have a better idea why... I suppose is because in that case is better to create a new local lexical scope with that binding instead of a more global one like we do with defn. Cheers! -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
