Just tried it out: results are a little worse comparing to vectors (1.75s vs 1.68s).
On Monday, July 23, 2012 10:56:01 PM UTC+3, puzzler wrote: > > I would guess you'd get closer to Scala's perf if you use records to > represent your trees, rather than vectors. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
