To some degree. Neither Clojure nor Haskell won't beat direct mutable code in Scala which results in 65ms on a machine 2x slower than my current.
On Monday, July 23, 2012 11:44:18 PM UTC+3, David Nolen wrote: > So your benchmark is just timing implementation details. > > I'm sure you can get get identical numbers to Scala / Haskell if you > provide your own ListBuffer implementation. > > David > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
