Perhaps you don't use sets as much as I do, so to help you put it in perspective, imagine how you'd feel if I told you:
"Oh by the way, that nice vector notation you use to write things like [1 3 5 7 2]. Yeah, well, it's only reliable if there are constants inside. That thing you've been doing where you write [a b c] -- that usually works, so you've probably been doing that a lot in your code. But some small percentage of the time, that will generate a run-time error. From now on, the only way to be safe is to replace every instance of a vector with non-constants with a call to vector, i.e., (vector a b c)." You *could* fix your code and develop new habits, but how would you feel about it? --Mark -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
