On Wed, Aug 15, 2012 at 9:53 AM, Jim - FooBar(); <jimpil1...@gmail.com> wrote:
> OK thanks a lot both of you....it turns out the != works just fine!
>
> at the moment I've almost completed the entire moving rules for chess and
> checkers (including kills) but only on an empty board...the only thing
> remaining to finish things off is ideally a 'non-blocking?' fn to check each
> move generated against the current-board. essentially filtering out the
> moves that are blocked by other pieces...do you think this can be done
> non-relationally by a novice or am I better off using a regular fn?
>
> any clues are greatly appreciated...
>
> Jim

Thinking relationally on large problems is challenging. When I'm
having serious trouble, I will often translate my solution into Prolog
and ask questions about it on StackOverflow - there seems to be an
active if small Prolog community there. Also #prolog on freenode seems
pretty helpful. Good luck and let us know what you discover along the
way! :)

David

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to