Clearly not. I also was not aware that it was a fancier version of 
SeamlessField. I'll try that first.

Pepijn

On Thursday, 30 August 2012 14:42:33 UTC+2, Gijs S. wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Re: ContentEditableField
>
> ContentEditableFIeld has only recently been added to the Google Closure 
> Library (
> http://code.google.com/p/closure-library/source/list?path=/trunk/closure/goog/editor/contenteditablefield.js&start=2035).
>  
> Are you sure that the version of the Google Closure Library that you use 
> with ClojureScript is recent enough?
>
> -Gijs
>
> On Thursday, August 30, 2012 1:54:41 PM UTC+2, Pepijn de Vos wrote:
>>
>> I finally started trying some ClojureScript, hoping things would be 
>> working and documented, but I'm still having a lot of trouble even getting 
>> a simple app together.
>>
>> cljs-build does a fair job at getting a working setup in a few minutes, 
>> but there is still a lot of things that are "just because" or are not at 
>> all. For now I'm just guessing when to use slashes, dots or dashes for 
>> interop.
>>
>> It seems people insist on using (:require [some.class.path :as p]) and 
>> then use some.class.path instead of p. Regardless of the reason for that, I 
>> can't seem to import this contenteditable field: 
>> http://closure-library.googlecode.com/svn/docs/class_goog_editor_ContentEditableField.html
>>
>> As I understand it, clojurescript namespace get compiled to closure 
>> provides calls. The provides call for ContentEditableField 
>> is goog.editor.ContentEditableField, yet I fail to require it any way I try.
>>
>> Importing something else, like goog.dom seems to work just fine.
>>
>> In some docs I read that if you use simple optimizations, you need to 
>> load goog.base and your code and then require it. I don't see any closure 
>> library output that I can use, and it seems to work without doing that. It 
>> seems strange to me that you would need different code on the client 
>> depending on the optimization level.
>>
>> Just to be sure, I also ran advanced compilation, in which case it 
>> complains about missing goog.editor.ContentEditableField at compile time.
>>
>> I hope someone can clear things up.
>>
>> Pepijn
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to