On Mon, Sep 03, 2012 at 02:03:14PM +0100, Jim - FooBar(); wrote: > Hi all, > > this is basically a continuation of my previous thread "Functional > performance vs imperative complexity"...for those of you who are > still interested here is what I learnt during the process. I should > note that i finally got the performance I was after without > sacrificing any immutability at all! so , how did I do that after > all that moaning and complaining? well, if I'm honest I *cheated* > !!!
Thanks for sharing! Indeed, I'm finding similarly that a decent amount of pre-processing and data-massaging can go a long way (as well as applying YAGNI to algorithmic evaluations). If you haven't already, I think this would make a good series of blog posts too! Cheers, Josh -- Joshua Ballanco ELC Technologies™ 1771 NW Pettygrove Street, Suite 140 Portland, OR, 97209 jballa...@elctech.com P +1 866.863.7365 F +1 877.658.6313 M +1 646.463.2673 T +90 533.085.5773 http://www.elctech.com -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
