The rationale appears to be up now, and for my money, it is quite clear: JSON not powerful enough, Clojure does too much and is a burden for implementers.
That said, I won't complain if somebody happens to implement full Clojure serialization while implementing edn. ;-) Stu > I expect there to be a point, and thus also expect it to be communicatable. > If there wasn't > a point, you wouldn't have chosen to use it in datomic, or create the page. I > feel you haven't > communicated the point adequately yet, which is why I raised the questions I > raised, also as > a sign to you that these questions do exist. As I wrote, I look forward to > reading the rationale. > It's not "you" who needs to convince me (or anybody), it's edn that needs to. > If it cannot convince > anyone, you're wasting your time. I don't expect you to waste your time. > Thus, I expect edn > to be able to convince me, once it gets its point across. And I will refrain > from further comments > until I've seen that "argument" edn makes for itself. > > Regards, > -Martin -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
