Indeed, there's no need for anything to be a reader macro, except concision. You can write this as an ordinary macro, eg, (crazy-fn %a %%b %%%c). If you try that and find it's awesome, share it with others. If it's universally loved, perhaps someday it could be a reader macro.
On Monday, September 17, 2012 1:59:56 AM UTC-7, DAemon wrote: > > So you would introduce all of the functions first, then insert the body > into the inside? Major issue that I can see is that it's very powerful and > very useful only in very specific circumstances, but isn't extensible at > all. Looks cool, though. Maybe you could write a macro that does something > like this? > > - DAemon > > On Sun, Sep 16, 2012 at 2:16 PM, vhsmaia <v...@viclib.com <javascript:>>wrote: > >> Hello. I'm new here, so, not sure if those were already posted. But why >> is this not used? An example would be: >> #(%a %%b %%%c) would be the same as (fn [a] (fn [b] (fn [c] (a b c))) >> >> -- >> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google >> Groups "Clojure" group. >> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:> >> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with >> your first post. >> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to >> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:> >> For more options, visit this group at >> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
