Thank you for your prompt reply Grant. *> May you share the original code? * * * I will post the original function very soon* *
*> Why does my-map have vectors storing maps inside instead of a map with > maps inside? * * * Because each vector will have more than one hash-map and each hash map will have multiple keys. I only posted a simplified version of the map for readability, unless I am missing something here... I think of vector as the equivalent of the "array of" and that's why I used it. If i should have done it in some other way please let me know. *> May you write some tests to demonstrate what you want to accomplish > with the ugly map and share them here? * * * I am basically trying to destruct my deep map with a better way than a 4-nested loop. I will post a better code snippet in order to clean things even more. Thanks again On Monday, October 1, 2012 12:41:52 AM UTC+3, Grant Rettke wrote: > > On Sun, Sep 30, 2012 at 2:59 PM, arekanderu <areka...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > I am trying to port an ugly piece of code from Ruby to clojure. > > May you share the original code? > > > So far I > > have only ported it to clojure by keeping the same way it was written in > > Ruby and i am trying to re-write it the clojure way > because...well....its > > very ugly. > > Why does my-map have vectors storing maps inside instead of a map with > maps inside? > > > I have a complex hash map which it's structure is always the same and > the > > keys always known and by using the values in those keys, i make some > > function calls with those values as parameters. You can find a > simplified > > version of the map and the function which steps into the map below. > > May you write some tests to demonstrate what you want to accomplish > with the ugly map and share them here? > > > I would really appreciate it if someone could propose an alternative way > > of writing the above function or at least to point me where can I look > for > > some useful clojure functions that will help me do what I want but in a > > cleaner way. > > Once you provide tests then we have a better chance at helping. > > -- > ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) > http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ > ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
