On 16/10/12 21:45, Alan Malloy wrote:
But really I don't think trampoline is a very compelling problem- solver here: the primary (only?) gain from trampoline is in reducing stack depth, and I rather doubt that you can calculate minimax for even a few hundred ply. So you're in no danger of a stackoverflow, but are sacrificing readability and a smidge of performance to keep your stack "really small" instead of "not big enough to be a problem".
I see what you mean...thanks for the detailed answer. Jim -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
