I figured you would use doto for that. On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 4:09 PM, JvJ <kfjwhee...@gmail.com> wrote: > Exactly. Not only debugging, but java interop that involved calling methods > with side effects. > > On Thursday, 18 October 2012 15:02:47 UTC-4, David Nolen wrote: >> >> On Thu, Oct 18, 2012 at 2:55 PM, Alan Malloy <al...@malloys.org> wrote: >>> >>> It's rare to get tired of this, because nobody does it: it's not >>> common because your interleaved statements are side-effecting only, >>> which is not encouraged in Clojure, and rarely needed. Certainly >>> sometimes it's the best way to do something, but not so often that I'd >>> become frustrated; if anything, having to write such irritating code >>> can serve as a good reminder that I shouldn't have so many >>> unrestrained side effects scattered through my logic. >> >> >> I think from the examples debugging via print statements was the main (and >> reasonable) use case. >> >> David > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your > first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
-- Grant Rettke | ACM, AMA, COG, IEEE gret...@acm.org | http://www.wisdomandwonder.com/ Wisdom begins in wonder. ((λ (x) (x x)) (λ (x) (x x))) -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
