Thanks.  I can't think of a feature at the moment.  I'm just trying to 
decide between the two.  I'm working on a rule engine/DSL for game AI and 
I'm trying to make a decision... but I still haven't worked out all the 
requirements.

On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 17:45:40 UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>
> Oh and of course AND and OR parallelism.
>
>
> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 5:44 PM, David Nolen <dnolen...@gmail.com<javascript:>
> > wrote:
>
>> There's not a list of features so much as a list of improvements I would 
>> like to make. Some medium to big project ideas:
>>
>> - CLP(Set)
>> - Improvements to tabling (currently a lot of redundant information is 
>> recorded)
>> - Negation (based on CiaoProlog work)
>> - Environment Trimming (to make the Definite Clause Grammar feature much 
>> more efficient)
>>
>> Not sure when I'll get to these - there is a considerable amount of 
>> interesting optimization work to be done on the current CLP(FD) 
>> implementation and surrounding CLP infrastructure.
>>
>> If there's some Prolog feature / predicate you'd like to see bring it up 
>> and it will be considered.
>>
>> David
>>
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 1:56 PM, JvJ <kfjwh...@gmail.com <javascript:>>wrote:
>>
>>> Is there a list of features that you'd like to implement that core.logic 
>>> doesn't have yet?
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tuesday, 11 December 2012 00:52:24 UTC-5, David Nolen wrote:
>>>
>>>> core.logic is still pretty young - some (many?) Prolog niceties may not 
>>>> be present. Don't know until you try ;)
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Dec 11, 2012 at 12:29 AM, JvJ <kfjwh...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I have some code that uses Prolog, but I want to get rid of the native 
>>>>> dependencies inherent in SWI Prolog/JPL.
>>>>>
>>>>> If I were to switch to core.logic, what would I lose and what would I 
>>>>> gain? 
>>>>>
>>>>> -- 
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient 
>>>>> with your first post.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>>>> clojure+u...@**googlegroups.com
>>>>>
>>>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/**group/clojure?hl=en<http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  -- 
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Clojure" group.
>>> To post to this group, send email to clo...@googlegroups.com<javascript:>
>>> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with 
>>> your first post.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
>>> clojure+u...@googlegroups.com <javascript:>
>>> For more options, visit this group at
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
>>>
>>
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en

Reply via email to