Yes a warning would be great as well as fixing the examples. Ticket & patch welcome.
On Monday, January 7, 2013, Peter Taoussanis wrote: > > I would not rely on this behavior. Follow Clojure's property access > conventions. > > Sorry to dig this up again - would just like to clarify: > > The idiomatic way of accessing something like `window.location.pathname` > then would be (aget js/window "location" "pathname"), or nested .- > accesses, correct? I know things with Cljs are developing quickly and > I keep seeing the `js/window.location.pathname` form pop up (including in > Clojurescript's samples/twitterbuzz/src/twitterbuzz/anneal.cljs), so just > wanted to double check. > > Assuming the latter form is indeed incorrect, any chance of adding a > compiler warning to start dissuading people from using it? > > Thanks! > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > Groups "Clojure" group. > To post to this group, send email to > [email protected]<javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > '[email protected]');> > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > your first post. > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] <javascript:_e({}, 'cvml', > 'clojure%[email protected]');> > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
