Anyway it's seems to me that message in this thread is pretty clear: "We're just doing fine without people like you"
It's a shame, but whatever I'll just shut up and let you guys roll as you pleased Regards -- Irakli Gozalishvili Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ On Saturday, 2013-01-19 at 22:31 , Irakli Gozalishvili wrote: > I would be curious to also see number of lost contributors. > > Regards > -- > Irakli Gozalishvili > Web: http://www.jeditoolkit.com/ > > > On Saturday, 2013-01-19 at 22:00 , David Nolen wrote: > > > I have nothing to add to this thread beyond pointing out that ClojureScript > > has had _51_ contributors in the short year and a half of its existence: > > http://github.com/clojure/clojurescript/graphs/contributors. > > > > Via JIRA. > > > > David > > > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > (mailto:clojure@googlegroups.com) > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > (mailto:clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com) > > For more options, visit this group at > > http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
