@Baishampayan, I'm just experimenting at the repl right now so there's no stopping condition yet. It's a socket server.
On Monday, February 11, 2013 11:56:22 PM UTC-8, Evan Mezeske wrote: > > Generally when you are calling functions that have (and depend on) > side-effects, you will end up using "do" a lot. Also, I noticed that in > your example there's really no reason to make the x and y bindings part of > the loop. > I hadn't thought about using a let in the loop but you're right, I could just as easily bind in a let. Is there a benefit to doing it there rather than in the loop binding? Maybe it makes it easier to read? -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
