Ah, yes, thought it was wrong somewhere! 


Stephen Compall <stephen.comp...@gmail.com> writes:

> On Feb 20, 2013 5:55 AM, "Phillip Lord" <phillip.l...@newcastle.ac.uk>
> wrote:
>>                      (do
>>                        (assoc curr (inc j) 0)
>>                        (recur (inc j) max-len)))
>
> Here you're discarding the result of assoc, a pure function, which changes
> the code's nature significantly.
>
>>                      (do
>>                        (assoc! curr (inc j) 0)
>>                        (recur (inc j) max-len)))
>
> Nor is it safe to discard the result of calling assoc!; see how assoc! is
> used in other online examples.

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to