On 2/27/13 9:59 AM, Isaac Gouy wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 1:13:10 AM UTC-8, Marko Topolnik wrote:
On Wednesday, February 27, 2013 5:19:20 AM UTC+1, Isaac Gouy wrote:
If idiomatic Clojure was used...
The problem, of course, is that: the code one-person considers
to be idiomatic; another person considers to be idiotic, naīve.
Not really. Take Stuart Halloway's opening example in the section
entitled /Why Clojure?/
(defn blank? [s] (every? #(Character/isWhitespace %) s))
Have you ever wondered about its performance?
No. Why would I wonder about the performance of a one line code
snippet that was written without concern for performance?
Because that one line of code is representative of the majority of
clojure functions (i.e. idiomatic clojure using core functions against
seqs).
-Ben
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
