On Mar 13, 2013, at 13:05, kovas boguta wrote: > On Wed, Mar 13, 2013 at 9:52 AM, Ambrose Bonnaire-Sergeant wrote: >> How useful is a fully macroexpanded AST to Codeq? ... > > I am strongly of the opinion that macroexpansion should not be part of > a codeq's core definition. ...
I agree, for your reasons and others. For example, I don't think a codeq should say much about _any_ symbol the code references. However, that seems to create a disconnect. If codeq is tracking raw code, and the AST reflects expanded code, (how) can the two be reconciled? -r -- http://www.cfcl.com/rdm Rich Morin http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/resume r...@cfcl.com http://www.cfcl.com/rdm/weblog +1 650-873-7841 Software system design, development, and documentation -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
