Ah, it works. It is really chunked sequences. Thanks.

Having been using clojure for half a year, it keeps really bringing me
surprise and fun :)

2013/3/17 Marko Topolnik <[email protected]>

> This is one of the most frequenly-asked questions and a source of surprise
> to practically every new Clojure user. An update to the official
> documentation on lazy sequences would surely help a lot here.
>
> -marko
>
>
> On Sunday, March 17, 2013 9:18:05 AM UTC+1, Evan Mezeske wrote:
>>
>> I'd guess that what you're seeing is related to chunked sequences:
>> http://blog.fogus.**me/2010/01/22/de-chunkifying-**sequences-in-clojure/<http://blog.fogus.me/2010/01/22/de-chunkifying-sequences-in-clojure/>.
>>
>> On Sunday, March 17, 2013 1:12:17 AM UTC-7, bruce li wrote:
>>>
>>> Hello, everyone. I'm writing some code that utilizes the lazy sequence.
>>> But I found something strange. Here is how:
>>>
>>> The code is like:
>>>
>>> (first (filter some-expensive-io urls))
>>>
>>> The code is aimed to find the first result of the operations on the urls
>>> that is not nil. However, it seems that the io operations are executed once
>>> more than needed. As the operations are slow, one more round increases the
>>> overhead dramatically.
>>>
>>> Then I tested other pieces of code, such as:
>>>
>>> (first (filter #(when (> % 1) (println %) %) (range)))
>>>
>>> It prints out:
>>> 2
>>> 3
>>> 4
>>> 5
>>> 6
>>> 7
>>> 8
>>> 9
>>> 10
>>> 11
>>> 12
>>> 13
>>> 14
>>> 15
>>> 16
>>> 17
>>> 18
>>> 19
>>> 20
>>> 21
>>> 22
>>> 23
>>> 24
>>> 25
>>> 26
>>> 27
>>> 28
>>> 29
>>> 30
>>> 31
>>>
>>> and returns: 2
>>>
>>> So why the lazy sequence is realized more than it is needed? Could I
>>> enforce the laziness and save unnecessary operation?
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Bruce Li
>>>
>>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> [email protected]
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
> "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
> email to [email protected].
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>
>
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to