On 20 March 2013 16:41, Marko Topolnik <marko.topol...@gmail.com> wrote:

> On Wednesday, March 20, 2013 4:34:32 PM UTC+1, James Reeves wrote:
>
>>
>> If validation happens "all around", that implies there is no one function
>> that can test whether a value of data is valid for a given data store. This
>> strikes me as a somewhat shaky foundation for a system.
>>
>
> The idea is that all validation functions share the same contract to call
> the appropriate *add-failure* function that registers the validation
> result.
>

I don't see why that would be necessary. Why not put all the validation
logic in one place?


>  There may be instances where it makes sense to use exceptions as a
>> control flow mechanism, but I wonder whether it wouldn't be better to use
>> something like CPS in those instances.
>>
>
> I can't picture how such a mechanism would work, and what benefit it would
> bring over the exceptions mechanism. CPS in Clojure means trampolining,
> which is quite an unwieldy, and I'd say "cheap" tack-on. A validating
> function would then be supposed to return a common, globally-defined
> "continuation", in fact just a simple function, that would redirect the
> flow towards the validation failure-handling case.
>

I wasn't thinking of validation when I suggested CPS, because I don't see a
need for any unusual control flow when validating data.

- James

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to