On 24/03/13 17:49, Shantanu Kumar wrote:
In this case, making the type immutable is probably encouraged but not
mandatory
yes true, it's not enforced or anything like that, but I'd say it is
more than just 'encouraged'... what would be the point of using
clojure's reference types with something mutable? there is nothing to be
gained from that, is there? the indirection of vars/refs only makes true
sense when dealing with values and pure functions...
Jim
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
