>
> The idea that people should read the source to get reasonably 
> straightforward stuff done is wrong and does a lot of long term damage to 
> the community.


I believe Jim meant to check the source to figure out how does it work, not 
that the way it's implemented is the most proper way to implement it.
If that's not what you wanted to point out can you please explain?

On Wednesday, March 27, 2013 5:13:35 AM UTC+2, Michael Klishin wrote:
>
>
> 2013/3/27 Jim - FooBar(); <jimpi...@gmail.com <javascript:>>
>
>> aaa see? always check the docs first and the sources second (if 
>> available)...I should have done that as well :)
>
>
> Definitely don't just check the sources and think it's something normal.
>
> Complain loudly to maintainers on this list that their documentation has 
> gaps and they should
> clarify this and that. The idea that people should read the source to get 
> reasonably straightforward
> stuff done is wrong and does a lot of long term damage to the community.
> -- 
> MK
>
> http://github.com/michaelklishin
> http://twitter.com/michaelklishin
>  

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to