On Fri, Apr 5, 2013 at 10:15 AM, Mayank Jain <firesof...@gmail.com> wrote:
> @DNolen > The link to the pdf looks broken. Any other link? > Point on language use: "looks broken"? If you actually tried it and it didn't work then it *is* broken, pretty much by definition, and "looks" is an unnecessary hedge. OTOH, if you didn't try it but thought it looked dodgy for some reason, it takes only a tiny bit of effort, typically, to test and see if it works. So, I'm not sure there's much use for saying a link "looks" broken instead of just verifying whether it is, and then reporting that it "is" broken if it is and rejoicing if it isn't. :) -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
