Care to elaborate which part is out of date? On Apr 26, 1:48 am, David Nolen <dnolen.li...@gmail.com> wrote: > Which is out of date. > > > > > > > > On Thu, Apr 25, 2013 at 12:47 PM, Alice <dofflt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Found this blog post written by fogus: > > > "To provide this level of flexibility Clojure establishes a level of > > indirection. Specifically, all function lookups through a Var occur, > > at the lowest level, through an atomic volatile. This happens every > > time that a function bound using the def/defn special forms is called. > > This indirection is not amenable to HotSpot optimizations." > > >http://blog.fogus.me/2011/10/14/why-clojure-doesnt-need-invokedynamic... > > > On Apr 25, 10:19 pm, Alice <dofflt...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > I create many small methods in java without worrying about the > > > performance since it's usually the target of inline optimization. For > > > example, > > > > public class Foo { > > > public static long inc(long l) { > > > return ++l; > > > } > > > > public static long f1() { > > > long l = 0; > > > for (int i=0; i < 1000000000; i++) { > > > l++; > > > } > > > return l; > > > } > > > > public static long f2() { > > > long l = 0; > > > for (int i=0; i < 1000000000; i++) { > > > l = inc(l); > > > } > > > return l; > > > } > > > > } > > > > (time (Foo/f1)) > > > (time (Foo/f1)) > > > (time (Foo/f1)) > > > (time (Foo/f2)) > > > (time (Foo/f2)) > > > (time (Foo/f2)) > > > > "Elapsed time: 23.309532 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 23.333039 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 21.714753 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 22.943366 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 21.612783 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 21.71376 msecs" > > > > But clojure funtions seem to be never get inlined. > > > > (def obj (Object.)) > > > > (defn getObj [] obj) > > > > (defn f1 [] obj) > > > (defn f2 [] (getObj)) > > > > (time (dotimes [n 100000000] (f1))) > > > (time (dotimes [n 100000000] (f1))) > > > (time (dotimes [n 100000000] (f1))) > > > (time (dotimes [n 100000000] (f2))) > > > (time (dotimes [n 100000000] (f2))) > > > (time (dotimes [n 100000000] (f2))) > > > > "Elapsed time: 67.758744 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 68.555306 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 68.725147 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 104.810459 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 103.273618 msecs" > > > "Elapsed time: 103.374595 msecs" > > > -- > > -- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google > > Groups "Clojure" group. > > To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com > > Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with > > your first post. > > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > > clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com > > For more options, visit this group at > >http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en > > --- > > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > > "Clojure" group. > > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > > email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > > For more options, visithttps://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
