Hi folks,
we have some code that needs to _not_ be lazy - the rough code we have is:
(defn parse-and-store [raw-data]
(try
(let [records (split-records raw-data)
results (map parse-record records)]
(do
(save-audit-data! raw-data)
(map (save-result! results))))
(catch Exception e
(save-error-data! raw-data e)))
Where save-audit-data!, save-result! and save-error-data! write to a
database.
This doesn't work properly, as-is, because in the case of a parsing error,
it should only save error data, not audit data or earlier results; but as
the parsing is done lazily, you can get a parse error on the
'save-results!' line, by which time audit data has already been saved.
What's the idiomatic way to avoid this? The options seem to be either to
use
(doall (map parse-record records))
or (mapv parse-record records)
Is either of these better? The latter is simpler, the former (to me)
expresses that you are deliberately forcing non-laziness. Or is there some
other alternative?
- Korny
--
Kornelis Sietsma korny at my surname dot com http://korny.info
.fnord { display: none !important; }
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
