I had a vague description for purnam 0.0.9: https://groups.google.com/forum/?fromgroups=#!topic/clojure/AgZ_wVtdUFI
Its the same code with a different read me... Get it here: https://github.com/zcaudate/purnam Excerpt: #### Features Purnam has three main components: 1. Angular Language Extensions 2. Jasmin Language Extensions for TDD with Karma 3. Clojurescript Language Extensions (which the previous two are built upon) #### Why not use lispyscript/coffeescript/clang? I like each of the languages for their own features: - coffeescript for its succinctness - lispyscript for its syntax and macros - clang for its sheer brilliance and audacity However, in using each language I did find some weaknesses - coffeescript and its ambiguous syntax that changes meaning with whitespace - lispyscript is too new for me and not widely adopted - clang is to ambitious in what it is trying to do (make angular work with clojure) and I think there are definite performance implications in doing so. The goal of this project is to provide opt-in language extensions for clojurescript to have the same sort of succintness when working with angular and all other javascript libraries. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
