Hi, Am Montag, 13. Mai 2013 16:48:13 UTC+2 schrieb Jim foo.bar: > > So the following is not encouraged because we disregard the result of > calling seq? >
I would prefer (not-any? empty? ...) with empty? being #(zero? (count %)) if all the values are data structures. If there might be sequences in there, you are in sequence land and should use seq as you did. But this is just my opinion, which - as you can see - is not mainstream. :) So don't worry and just use seq (you are on the safe side then, anyway). Meikel -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
