Thank you. I've found it yesterday, too; just in time :) On Wednesday, May 29, 2013 7:42:58 AM UTC+4, Ben Mabey wrote: > > On Tue May 28 02:40:33 2013, Dmitry Groshev wrote: > > Sorry, I wasn't clear enough in my proposal. > > > > I've mentioned clojurecheck [1] in it and the possibility of extending > > it, because in my Erlang experience property-based testing is > > extremely helpful for things that operates on something pure in > > complicated way — exactly like core.matrix. But clojurecheck (AFAIK) > > doesn't support a (arguably) critical feature of "shrinking" — that > > is, reducing a failing randomly generated test case (that can be huge > > and very unwieldy to check by hand) to a minimal one. So, I suppose, > > given the fair amount of literature on the topic, shrinking can be > > done during this project. It's not a "plan" yet, though, just an idea. > > > > I just ran across this new github project with shrinkage: > https://github.com/reiddraper/simple-check >
-- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
