Wolodja Wentland <babi...@gmail.com> writes: > On 13 Jun 2013 15:31, "Aaron Cohen" <aa...@assonance.org> wrote: >> >> What about Overtone? http://overtone.github.io/ > > Overtone is certainly great, but I would rather classify it as a library as > you still have to write programs to use it. There might be an independent > UI these days that I am unfamiliar with though.
The problem that you have here is that the definition of "end-user". Overtone allows people with both musical and programming skills to use both to make noise. These are end-users, albeit a rather narrow selection. I'm building a library for the construction of ontologies with a similar aim. Non-programmers should be able to use it to build ontologies; programming ontologists should be able to use it to build ontologies more easily. End-user? Well, it's not designed for programmers (only), nor for anyone who cares about clojure. Ironically, when I did the last release, people here complained about the documentation -- it made the assumption that the reader knew what an ontology was; a bad assumption for people here. So, it depends what you mean by "end-user". If you mean "with a GUI", that's a nice and simple definition. Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
