On Wed, Jul 3, 2013 at 7:50 PM, Dragan Djuric <draga...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >> I probably won't be able to resist to type check it with core.typed at >> some point. >> > > If you contribute that, or help me baking in (some) non-invasive type > checking into Fluokitten, that would be FANTASTIC! I have that in vague > long-term plans, but I haven't had time to look at core.typed (I only > skimmed through the homepage when it was released). > I'm very glad you're interested! Skimming your code, you use conj a lot (via into). I'm actually working on an accurate and extensible type for conj type right now. The code looks very pure and accommodating for type checking. > > >> And enough documentation to satisfy Michael Klishin? I'm impressed :) >> >> > Thanks :) Actually, one of the main project goals is to make monads (et > al) approachable for beginners, and for that, docs and tutorials are the > main thing. So, this library really does not make much sense without lots > of documentation. I hope to even improve it on that point. > Thought: Whether type signatures help for beginners here is debatable. It probably makes some parts clearer, and some parts incomprehensible. Anyway, I'll be in touch, congratulations again :) Ambrose -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
