This is with 0.2.0-rc2.
This expression evaluates as expected:
user> (m/match [:r :d]
[:s :d] nil
[:r :t] nil
[:r :d] :x
[:s :t] nil)
:x
But this one throws an exception:
user> (m/match [:r :d]
[:r :t] nil
[:s :d] nil
[:r :d] :x
[:s :t] nil)
IllegalArgumentException No matching clause: :r :d user/eval1087
(NO_SOURCE_FILE:1)
They're the same except the order of the first two match expressions has
been flipped. Surely this should match on the third row?
--
Ben Wolfson
"Human kind has used its intelligence to vary the flavour of drinks, which
may be sweet, aromatic, fermented or spirit-based. ... Family and social
life also offer numerous other occasions to consume drinks for pleasure."
[Larousse, "Drink" entry]
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
