> The Clojure philosophy is that it is rather irritating to think your > recursive call is going to be cleverly optimized into a loop, and then if > you're wrong, you have no good way to know that. So the idea is that you > use the word "recur" to indicate that *you* think it can be optimized into > a loop, and then the compiler tells you if you are right or wrong. >
inc I like it that way, even if you use the word "recur" and some accumulator. -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
