> The Clojure philosophy is that it is rather irritating to think your 
> recursive call is going to be cleverly optimized into a loop, and then if 
> you're wrong, you have no good way to know that.  So the idea is that you 
> use the word "recur" to indicate that *you* think it can be optimized into 
> a loop, and then the compiler tells you if you are right or wrong.
>

inc 

I like it that way, even if you use the word "recur" and some accumulator. 

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.


Reply via email to