On Tuesday, 23 July 2013 21:55:12 UTC+1, Sean Corfield wrote: > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:53 PM, Ben Wolfson <wol...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > wrote: > > On Tue, Jul 23, 2013 at 1:50 PM, Stefan Kamphausen > > <ska...@gmail.com<javascript:>> > > > wrote: > >> It complects require and refer ;-) > > How so? > > Because use = require + refer (essentially). >
That's more like "composing" rather than"complecting" IMHO. Composing is perfectly good practice: once you've made things "simple" (require and refer) then it's perfectly legitimate to compose them again in order to make things "easy" for users (use). Clojure does this all over the place in the name of user convenience (e.g. empty? = not + seq ). -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
