"John D. Hume" <duelin.mark...@gmail.com> writes: > On Oct 8, 2013 5:35 AM, "Phillip Lord" >> > I'm not sure a type checker will help in that instance. >> >> >> A type-checker wouldn't no, but a type system would; pretty much >> every language with a static type system has a type based dispatch >> somewhere. It would be nice to be able to do >> >> (defun fn >> ([^vector v] ...) >> ([^list l] ...) >> ([else] ...) > > How is Clojure's protocols feature different from what you're describing?
Yeah, I picked a bad example, following on from the previous. I was thinking where the classes are defined in Java and there are several of them -- class based overloading in otherwords. Phil -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
