How looks this?
(defn conditional [x condition consequent alternative]
(if (condition x)
(consequent x)
(alternative x))))
(conditional (some-expression) p f g)
Am 15.10.2013 19:02, schrieb Sean Corfield:
Yeah, I found when I first got started with Clojure I tended to use
let for intermediate named results but over time I've moved to using
small, private top-level functions instead because I want to focus on
the names of the _functionality_ rather than the names of intermediate
_data_. I still use let for some things but nowhere near as much as I
used to.
One construct using let that I see in my code quite a bit that I
haven't figured out a cleaner way to express:
(let [x (some-expression)]
(if (p x)
(f x)
(g x)))
I get tempted to write a utility function for it but I haven't come up
with a good name for it :)
Sean
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 9:00 AM, Alex Baranosky
<alexander.barano...@gmail.com> wrote:
I and some of my coworkers do tend to avoid `let` unless in this particular
case you especially want to emphasize the name of something unobvious. OFten
I'd prefer to pull out a new function over using let, or inline the binding
for readability *improvement*.
On Tue, Oct 15, 2013 at 8:18 AM, Raoul Duke <rao...@gmail.com> wrote:
if a programming language doesn't have something like 'where', then i
am sad. http://stackoverflow.com/questions/4362328/haskell-where-vs-let
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
your first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
