On 22 Oct 2013, at 18:45, Mark Engelberg <mark.engelb...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I looked briefly at the code and can confirm that to my eye, the two > implementations appear to be implementing the same algorithm. Thanks - always good to have a second pair of eyes :-) > My first guess would be that the performance difference comes from Clojure's > use of boxed numbers That was my first thought too - but I thought that I'd look at a profile first :-) -- paul.butcher->msgCount++ Snetterton, Castle Combe, Cadwell Park... Who says I have a one track mind? http://www.paulbutcher.com/ LinkedIn: http://www.linkedin.com/in/paulbutcher MSN: p...@paulbutcher.com AIM: paulrabutcher Skype: paulrabutcher -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
