Andy, I do think that if a debugging feature has to be limited to a particular environment then Leiningen would be preferable to any other, since it's so simple to install and use (and maybe most people have it anyway?) that people who use other environments could, without too much trouble, do a new run from Leiningen when they know they need to do some debugging. Not as good as having it work everywhere with whatever you're already using, of course, but certainly better than (for example) requiring that you figure out how to install and use an Emacs-based environment just to figure out what values your locals have when you crash.
Would what you have in mind work from "lein run" as well as "lein repl"? FWIW I (and my students) do a lot via "lein run". -Lee On Nov 7, 2013, at 2:47 PM, Andy Fingerhut wrote: > Lee, I am curious whether you would consider it "too tied to a particular dev > environment" if the kind of minimal debugging features you wish for worked > from Leiningen's REPL? i.e. 'lein repl' > > I do not know if Ritz can work in such an environment or not, but I am > guessing it might be easier to get a subset of it working there than from a > REPL started via 'java -cp clojure.jar clojure.main' > > Andy -- -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your first post. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en --- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Clojure" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
