On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 4:43 PM, Timothy Washington <twash...@gmail.com>wrote:

> The crux of the problem is that the size of *params* can be variable.
> Only at runtime, does the code match the loaded *afn*, with the passed in
> *params*. So I basically just need to break out the *~@params* into
> individuated input arguments. The only other way I can think to do that,
> without using eval, would be to curry afn, for each input param.
>

Can you just use `apply`?


>
>
> Tim Washington
> Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com>
>
>
> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 7:20 PM, Jason Wolfe <ja...@w01fe.com> wrote:
>
>> Glad to help.
>>
>> I admittedly haven't taken the time to understand what's going on in your
>> code, but whenever I see `eval` I feel compelled to ask: are you sure you
>> need it?
>>
>> With that out of the way, here's a trick I've used to work around related
>> errors:
>>
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msg/clojure/BZwinR2zNgU/8HGOgzOxzosJ
>>
>> Best,
>> Jason
>>
>> On Friday, January 3, 2014 3:18:22 PM UTC-8, frye wrote:
>>
>>> Hey Jason,
>>>
>>> You were exactly right (which is pretty impressive, being that you've
>>> never seen my code). In my (s/defn ..) form, there was an error that was
>>> failing silently.
>>>
>>> (s/defn [one two]
>>>    ...
>>>    *#_(def params (atom '({}) ))*
>>>    (def params '({}))
>>>    (try (eval `(~afn ~@params))  (catch Exception e (println "Exception:
>>> " (.getMessage e)))))
>>>
>>>
>>> So the abouve code works. But if I instead use the commented version,
>>> I'll get an exception. It seems there's a problem passing in a form
>>> containing an atom to be dynamically eval'd. The error is mentioned on
>>> these posts (here <http://clojure-log.n01se.net/date/2009-03-02.html>and
>>> here<http://www.raynes.me/logs/irc.freenode.net/clojure/2012-09-17.txt#>).
>>> Is there a way to pass in a form containing an atom to be dynamically
>>> eval'd? It's pretty important to my architecture, that all functions treat
>>> that system-atom the same. Any insights are welcome.
>>>
>>> *"java.lang.RuntimeException: Can't embed object in code, maybe
>>> print-dup not defined: clojure.lang.Atom@1c99db7 (NO_SOURCE_FILE:0)"*
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Tim Washington
>>> Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 2:39 PM, Jason Wolfe <ja...@w01fe.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Thanks for the report.
>>>>
>>>> Schema fns inside of go blocks seem to work fine for me.  It seems
>>>> likely that you're seeing an exception inside the go block, which is
>>>> swallowed by default:
>>>>
>>>> user> (clojure.core.async/go (println "A"))
>>>> #<ManyToManyChannel clojure.core.async.impl.channels.ManyToManyChannel@
>>>> 46ae10a6>
>>>> A
>>>>
>>>> user> (clojure.core.async/go (throw (RuntimeException.)) (println "A"))
>>>> #<ManyToManyChannel clojure.core.async.impl.channels.ManyToManyChannel@
>>>> 427c78c1>
>>>>
>>>> Would you mind wrapping the body of your go block in a try/catch and
>>>> printing the exception stack trace, or posting a gist that demonstrates the
>>>> issue so I can look into it further?
>>>>
>>>> Thanks!
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Friday, January 3, 2014 10:21:16 AM UTC-8, frye wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Forwarding...
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------- Forwarded message ----------
>>>>> From: Timothy Washington <twas...@gmail.com>
>>>>> Date: Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 1:17 PM
>>>>> Subject: Re: Core.async, Rules for passing clojure vals to go block
>>>>> To: Shaun Gilchrist <shaun...@gmail.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm using Prismatic's Schema in my code base. Now, it looks like
>>>>> defining some functions with 
>>>>> s/defn<https://github.com/Prismatic/schema/blob/master/src/clj/schema/macros.clj#L453>,
>>>>> yields some wonky behaviour. Particularly, not running, when being invoked
>>>>> in a go block. It just fails silently, which is why it was so hard to 
>>>>> track
>>>>> down. Don't yet know why this is happening. But an fyi for the devs and
>>>>> users of this package. Still love schema, I just need to figure out where
>>>>> the call chain breaks down.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Hth
>>>>>
>>>>> Tim Washington
>>>>> Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Jan 3, 2014 at 9:58 AM, Timothy Washington 
>>>>> <twas...@gmail.com>wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Hey Shaun,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks for looking into this. Your example does indeed work. I'll
>>>>>> have to teardown my own code and see where the invocations are failing. 
>>>>>> At
>>>>>> least I know it's not core.async.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Cheers
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Tim Washington
>>>>>> Interruptsoftware.com <http://interruptsoftware.com>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>  --
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
> Groups "Clojure" group.
> To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
> Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with
> your first post.
> To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
> For more options, visit this group at
> http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to a topic in the
> Google Groups "Clojure" group.
> To unsubscribe from this topic, visit
> https://groups.google.com/d/topic/clojure/j8QWNnFNIVg/unsubscribe.
> To unsubscribe from this group and all its topics, send an email to
> clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.
>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
Groups "Clojure" group.
To post to this group, send email to clojure@googlegroups.com
Note that posts from new members are moderated - please be patient with your 
first post.
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to
clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/clojure?hl=en
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Clojure" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to clojure+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/groups/opt_out.

Reply via email to